ÔÚ¼ÒÂôÉúÈÕµ°¸â׬ǮßÂ, ×Ô¼ºÔÚ¼ÒÔõÑù׬Ǯ, ÔÚ¼Ò´úÀí׬ǮµÄÂð ,Å®ÈËÔÚ¼Ò¿ÉÒÔÔõô׬Ǯ ÔÚ¼Ò´øº¢×ÓÔõôʵ¼Ê׬Ǯ , 

 ÔÚ¼ÒÀï¿ÉÒÔ×öЩʲôÀ´×¬Ç®, ÔõÑù²ÅÄÜÔÚ¼Ò¶¼ÄÜ׬Ǯ, ѧÉú·Å¼ÙÔÚ¼Ò´ò×Ö׬Ǯ ,ÔÚ¼ÒÀï׬ǮƫÃÅ ÔÚ¼Ò´ò×Ö׬Ǯ¿¿Æ×Âð , 

 ÔÚ¼Ò×öʲô¹¤×÷×î׬Ǯ֮µÀ, ³¤Ô«ÏØ Å®ÈËÔÚ¼Ò׬Ǯ, ÊÖ»úÔÚ¼Ò׬ǮÈÕÈëǧԪ ,ÔÚ¼ÒÔõô¼æְ׬Ǯ֮µÀ ÔÚ¼ÒÀï×öʲôÄÜ׬Ǯ ¼æÖ° , 

 Ö£ÖÝÔÚ¼ÒÍøÉϼæְ׬ǮÂð, ÓÐʲôѧÉúÔÚ¼Ò¶¼ÄÜ׬ǮµÄ, ÔÚ¼ÒÑøÖ³³èÎï׬Ǯ ,×óȨÏØÅ®ÈËÔÚ¼Ò׬Ǯ ʲôÊÇÔÚ¼ÒÄÜ׬ǮµÄÈí¼þ , 

 Ë®¹ûÔÚ¼ÒÔõô×öÄÜ׬Ǯ, ÍíÉÏÔÚ¼Ò¿ÉÒÔ×öʲô¼æְ׬Ǯ, ÔÚ¼Ò¼æְ׬ǮһÌìÄÜÊÕÈë¶àÉÙ ,Ū¸öʲôС»úÆ÷ÔÚ¼Ò׬Ǯ ÀûÐÁÏØÅ®ÈËÔÚ¼Ò׬Ǯ , 

ÍøÉϼæÖ°ÏÂÈí¼þÕõÇ®¿¿Æ×Âð ×îÐÂÏà¹Ø½éÉÜ

�ؤդ¥

Across to one of its longer sides he led them.±¤¥ðí»¥ï¥¤¤

�±¤¤

"Come, come," I replied, touched by the kind anxiety of these people. "Come, come; it won't be as bad as all that, and, then, I am a Netherlander."£Ùà

�£îÜÜ

The other great ethical method of the eighteenth century, its hedonism, was closely connected with the sceptical movement in speculative philosophy, and, like that, received an entirely new significance by becoming associated with the idea of law. Those who isolate man from the universe are necessarily led to seek in his interests as such the sole regulator of his actions, and their sole sanction in the opinion of his fellows. Protagoras went already so far, notwithstanding his unwillingness to recognise pleasure as the supreme end; and in the system of his true successor, Aristippus, the most extreme hedonism goes hand in hand with the most extreme idealism; while with Epicurus, again, both are tempered by the influence of naturalism, imposing on him its conceptions of objective law alike in science and in practice. Still his system leaned heavily to the side of self-gratification pure and simple; and it was reserved for modern thought to establish a complete equilibrium between the two competing tendencies of Greek ethics. This has been effected in Utilitarianism; and those critics are entirely mistaken who, like M. Guyau, regard that system as a mere reproduction of Epicureanism. It might with full as much reason be called a modern version of Stoicism. The idea of humanity is essentially Stoic; to work for the good of humanity was a424 Stoic precept; and to sacrifice one’s own pleasure for that higher good is a virtue which would have satisfied the most rigorous demands of a Cleanthes, an Epictêtus, or an Aurelius.¤ÚÓ³¨¤¤¤¤Õ¥¤Ì

�¤ñ¤¥

�±á¤£¥à¤

�¤º¥¶Ð¥

�Ú¨¥ö¥¤¥¢¥Ç

�¥·¥ÐÅथ¤¤à¤

Bruno himself acted as a mediator between the two philo384sophies. His sympathies with Platonism were strongly pronounced, he looked with admiration on its mediaeval supporters, especially David of Dinan; and regretted the time when Oxford was a focus of realistic teaching, instead of being what he found her, devoted to the pedantic humanism of the Renaissance.547 He fully accepted the pantheistic conclusions towards which Platonism always tended; but in proclaiming an absolute principle whence all specific differences are evolved, he is careful to show that, while it is neither Form nor Matter in the ordinary sense, it may be called Matter in the more refined signification attached to that term by Plotinus and, indeed, by Aristotle himself. There is a common substance underlying all abstract essences, just as there is a common substance left behind when the sensible qualities of different bodies are stripped off; and both are, at bottom, the same. Thus monism became the banner round which the older forms of Greek speculation rallied in their assault on Aristotle’s philosophy, though what monism implied was as yet very imperfectly understood.Ò¥¤½¥¥°¥¥

�òºî¥¤ìØ¥ñ

�¤¥¥¥Ó¥ª¤ÆÓ¤

�¤¤¥¥Ñ¤¤µ¤©¥ã

“That means that Jeff is innocent and has made friends with Sandy; but where is the woman?”¡¥Ó¤ä¤Ï¤¥Ðय

She said "Yes" as frankly as she would have said it to the children. It was blighting to any budding romance, but he tried hard nevertheless to save the next question from absolute baldness. He had a resentful sort of feeling that he was entitled to at least a little idealism. As she would not give it, he tried to find it for himself, noting the grace of her long free neck, the wealth of her coarse black hair, and the beauty of her smiling mouth. But the smiling mouth answered his low-spoken "Will you marry me then, dear?" with the same frank assent. "Not for a good while, though," she added. "I am too young." That was all, and in a moment she was telling him some of Brewster's absurdities, with a certain appreciation of the droll that kept it from being malicious.©Êdü¥ïÓÈ×¥¤